Spatial dynamic of the agriculture fields towards their shape and size

O.V. Zhukov, V.O. Sirovatko, N.O. Ponomarenko


We estimated the size and shape characteristics of agricultural fields within the administrative area and identified patterns of the margin trends from 1950-1960 till the present time. Here we considered large-scale soil maps for the area of Vasilkovsky district of the Dnepropetrovsk region, which were drawn up in 1950-1960. To assess the landscape metric we used FRAGSTATS program which allow to make conformity assessment of the observed distributions of field sizes regards the normal, exponential, log-normal, gamma, Weibull, and Pareto distributions. We also used Box-Cox transformation to convert the experimental data into the normal distribution law for the further application of the transformed data in regression analysis. We estimated that the area of agricultural fields ranged from 1.20 to 269.00 hectares during the period of large-scale mapping in 1950-1960. The variation limits of the field sizes based on the results of remote sensing data and in our time they are 2,.5-266.57 hectares. Area of the fields in different periods strongly correlate and are statistically significant (r = 0.98, p = 0.00). Field sizes currently associated with the field sizes in the 50-60 years of linear regression. Shape parameters and field sizes significantly correlated, therefore, to establish the main trends of varying shape and size of fields, as well as for non-multicollinearity variables for regression analysis, we performed a multivariate factor analysis. An important aspect of the structuring of the agri-landscape is the location of settlements and, therefore, the fields distance from them. In results obtained indicate that the processes increase and decrease the size of fields in agricultural production are determined by various factors. Aspects of the shape and size of the fields associated with the dynamics of the processes that lead to variations in field areas. Fields that have shown a tendency to change their size, have different characteristics of forms and size from the stable fields. Typically, variable field size is smaller and more complex shapes.


agricultural field;shape;size;statistical distribution;landscape ecology

Full Text:



Alados, C.L., Pueyo, Y., Barrantes, O., Escós, J., Giner, L., Robles, A. (2004). Variations in landscape patterns and vegetation cover between 1957 and 1994 in a semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Landscape ecology, 19, 5, 543–559.

Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28, 2, 168–192.

Alberti, M., Marzluff, J., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C. Sumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53 (12): 1169–1179.

Asar, O. (2014). Estimating Box–Cox Power Transformation Parameter via Goodness of Fit Tests. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 43 (7), 1740–1759

Bogaert, J., Rousseau, R., Van Hecke, P., Impens, I. (2000). Alternative area–perimeter ratios for measurement of 2–D shape compactness of habitats. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 111, 71–85.

Boutin, C., Jobin, B. (1998). Intensity of agricultural practices and effects on adjacent habitats. Ecol. Appl., 8, 544–557.

Box, G.E.P., Cox, D.R. (1964). An Analysis of Transformations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 26, 211–252.

Concepción, E.D., Díaz, M., Fernández–González, F. (2012). Plant diversity partitioning in Mediterranean croplands: effects of farming intensity, field edge, and landscape context. Ecol. Appl., 22, 972–981.

Debatsa, S.R., Luob, D., Estesa, L.D., Fuchsc, T.J., Caylor, K.K. (2016). A generalized computer vision approach to mapping crop fields in heterogeneous agricultural landscapes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 179(15), 210–221.

Delignette–Muller, M.L., Dutang, C. (2015). fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions. Journal of Statistical Software, 64(4), 1–34.

Duelli, P. (1997). Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 62, 81–91.

Fahrig, L., Baudry, J., Brotons, L., Burel, F.G., Crist, T.O. et al. (2011). Functional heterogeneity and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol. Lett., 14, 101–112.

Fahrig, L., Girard, J., Duro, D., Pasher, J., Smith, A. et al. (2015). Farmlands with smaller crop fields have higher within–field biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 200, 219–234. doi : 10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.018

Fahrig, L., Nuttle, W.K. (2005). Population ecology in spatially heterogeneous environments (pp. 95–118). In: Lovett, G.M., Jones, C.G.,

Turner, M.G., Weathers, K.C. (Eds.), Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes. Springer–Verlag, New York.

Garrabou, J., Riera, J., Zabala, M. (1998). Landscape pattern indices applied to Mediterranean subtidal rocky benthic communities. Landscape ecology, 13, 4, 225–247.

Holland, J.D., Fahrig, L. (2000). Effect of woody borders on insect density and diversity in crop fields: a landscape–scale analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 78, 115–122.

Jiao, L., Liu, Y. (2012). Analyzing the Shape Characteristics of Land Use Classes in Remote Sensing Imagery. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, I–7, 135–140.

Jomaaa, I., Audab, Y., Abi Salehc, B., Hamze, M., Safi, S. (2008). Landscape spatial dynamics over 38 years under natural and anthropogenic pressures in Mount Lebanon. Landscape and urban planning, 87, 1, 67–75.

Kuchma, T.L. (2015). Indication landscape diversity according to remote sensing: Thesis of Doctoral Dissertation. Kyiv (in Ukranian).

Kleijn, D., Verbeek, M. (2000). Factors affecting the species composition of arable field boundary vegetation. J. Appl. Ecol., 37, 256–266.

Kovalchuk, I.P. (2014). Current issues of geo–mapping of land resources Administrative Region. Geopolitics and exogeodynamics of the regions, 10, 1, 58–62 (in Ukranian).

Kraseha, Y.N. (2011). Modern features of methodology for mapping soils. Agricultural chemistry and soil science, 20–26 (in Ukranian).

LaGro, J.Jr. (1991). Assessing patch shapein landscapemosaics. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens, 57, 285–293.

Lindenmayer, D., Hobbs, R., Montague–Drake, R., Alexandra, J., Bennett, B. et al. (2008). A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol. Lett., 11, 78–91.

Malaviya, S., Munsi, M., Oinam, G., Joshi, P.K., (2010). Landscape approach for quantifying land use land cover change (1972–2006) and habitat diversity in a mining area in Central India (Bokaro, Jharkhand), Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 170, 215–229.

Marshall, E.J.P., Moonen, A.C. (2002). Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 89, 5–21.

McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J., (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Report PNW–GTR–351, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.

Medvedev, V.V., Plisko, I.V. (2006). Bonitet and quality assessment of arable lands of Ukraine. Kharkiv. 13 typography (in Russian).

Merckx, T., Feber, R.E., Dulieu, R.L., Townsend, M.C., Parsens, M.S., Bourn, N.A.D., Riordan, P., MacDonald, D.W. (2009). Effect of field margins on moths depends on species mobility: field–based evidence for landscape–scale conservation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 129, 302–309.

Merckx, T., Marini, L., Feber, R.E., MacDonald, D.E. (2012). Hedgerow trees and extended–width field margins enhance macro–moth diversity: implications for management. J. Appl. Ecol., 49, 1396–1404.

Milne, B.T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns (pp. 199–235). In: Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. (eds), Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity. Springer–Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

Navarro–Cerrillo, R., Guzmán–Álvarez, J., Clavero–Rumbao, I. Ceaceros, C. (2012). Spatial pattern of landscape changes and consequence changes in species diversity between 1956–1999 of Pinus halepensis Miller plantations in Montes de Malaga State Park (Andalusia, Spain). Open Journal of Ecology, 2, 154–165. doi: 10.4236/oje.2012.23019.

Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Jones, C.G. (2000). Generation of heterogeneity by organism: creation, maintenance, and transformation (pp. 33–52). In Ecological consequences of habitat heterogeneity, M. Hutchings, L. John, A. Stewart (Eds.). New York: Blackwell, 33–52.

Polchina, S.M. (2004). Field research and mapping of soils. Chernyvtsi, Ruta (in Ukranian).

Puzachenko, Y.G. (2004). Mathematical methods in the ecology and geography investigations. Moscow. Academy (in Russian).

R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R–

Reymers, N.F. (1994). Ecology. Theory, laws, rules, principles and hypotheses. Moscow. Rossia Molodaya (in Russian).

Riley, S.J., De Gloria, S.D., Elliot, R. (1999). A Terrain Ruggedness that Quantifies Topographic Heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Science, 5, 1–4, 23–27.

Rocchini, D., Perry, G.L., Salerno, M., Maccherini, S., Chiarucci, A. (2006). Landscape change and the dynamics of open formations in a natural reserve. Landscape and urban planning, 77, 1–2, 167–177.

Roschewitz, I., Gabriel, D., Tscharntke, T., Thies, C. (2005). The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 873–882

Schippers, P., Joenje, W. (2002). Modelling the effect of fertiliser, mowing, disturbance and width on the biodiversity of plant communities of field boundaries. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 93, 351–365.

Sulin, M. A. (2005). Land planning. Saint Petersburg. "Lan" Publisher (in Russian).

Tinker, D.B., Romme, W.H., Despain, D.G. (2003). Historic range of variability in landscape structure in subalpine forests of the Grater Yellowstone Area, USA. Landscape ecology, 18, 4, 427–439.

Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J., Rand, T., Didham, R., Fahrig, L. et al. (2012). Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes – eight hypotheses. Biol. Rev. 87, 661–685.

Vickery, J.E., Feber, R.E., Fuller, R.J. (2009). Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: a review of food resource provision for farmland birds. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 133, 1–13.

Vitousek, P.M. (1994). Beyond global warming: ecology land global change. Ecology 75(7), 1861–1876.

Wehling, S., Diekmann, M. (2010). Prediction of changes in the occurrence of forest herbs in hedgerow networks along a climate gradient in north–western Europe. Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 2537–2552.

Whittaker, R.H. (1967). Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev., 42, 207–264.

Zhukov, O.V., Pisarenko, P.V., Kunah, O.M., Dichenko, O.J. (2015). Role of landscape diversity in dynamics of abundance of sugar beet pests population in Poltava region. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 23, 1, 21–27 (in Ukranian).

Zhukov, O.V., Pisarenko, P.V., Kunah, O.M., Dichenko, O.J. (2015). Assessment of the variation within space and time plant cover by means of remote sensing. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economy University, 2, 36, 105–112 (in Ukranian).

Zhukov, A.V., Kunah, O.M., Zadorozhnaja, G.A., Andrusevich, E.V. (2013). Landscape ecology as a basis of the spatial analysis of agrocoenosis productivity. Ecology and Noospherology, 24, 1–2, 68–80 (in Russian).

Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.M., Taran, V.O., Lebedinska, M.M. (2016). Spatial variability of soils electrical conductivity within arena of the river dnepr valley (territory of the natural reserve “Dniprovsko–Orilsky”). Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), 129–157 (in Ukranian).

Zybalov, V.S. (2014). Environmental regulation of the spatial structure of agro–ecosystems in the southern Urals. Science of the South Ural State University. Natural science section, 379–384 (in Russian).


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Since April 2018 Journal changed the editorial policy and starts to be published exclusively in English, and changed its main site into


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2017 Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. ISSN 2520-2138