IMPROVEMENT OF THE SILAGE QUALITY AND MILK PRODUCTIVITY OF CATTLE BY THE USE OF A NEW LIOPHYLIZED BIOLOGICAL PRESERVATIVE

P. I. Baryshnikov, V. N. Khaustov, S. V. Burtseva, R. V. Nekrasov, M. G. Chabaev, A. A. Zelenchenkova, D. A. Durnikin

Abstract


The effect of new biological preservative representing the mix of liophylized lactobacteria strains Lactobacillus plantarum VKPM V-4173; Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis VKPM V-2092, and Propionibacterium acidipropionici VKPMV-5723 (at a ratio of 40:40:20) on the quality of a maize silage has been studied. The total bacteria content in the preparation was 1´1011 CFU/g. Different variants of a silage conservation have been accesses under laboratory conditions using laboratory vessels; the variants included a preservative-free (control) variant and the dosages of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 g per a ton of conserved maize green mass. The evaluation of the dynamical changes in the ammonia content, pH, organic acid content and their ratio, and the analysis of the chemical composition of a silage performed at the 7th, 21st, and 60th days after the filling showed the dosage of 3.0 g/ton provided the best results.

An industrial testing of the studied preservative (3.0 g/ton) showed that, comparing to the preservative-free silage, the use of the new preservative during the filling of a maize sillage provided the better preservation of nutrients and more optimal pH and ratio of organic acids in the silage mass. The industrial evaluation of the effect of the preservative addition to the silage on the productivity of milk cattle (n = 12) showed that the maximum average daily yield of milk of the basis fat content was obtained from cows of the experimental group, which ration included maize silage prepared with the use of the studied preservative. This yield made 28.86 kg that exceeds the same value of the control group by 4.0%. The feeding of cows with the silage prepared with the use of the new preservative provided an increase of the volatile fatty acid content and bacteria amount in the rumen contents and simultaneously decreased the ammonia content that evidenced the improvement of the digestion processes. The digestibility of nutrients of the whole ration of cows from the experimental group was higher than that in the control group.


 


Keywords


silage; biological preservative; cattle; milk productivity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Викторов П.И. Методика и организация зоотехнических опытов. – М.: Агропромиздат. – 1991. – 112 с.

Вулфорд М. Силос, сенаж: руководство по заготовке. – Киев: Олтек Украина. – 2007. – 52 с.

Дуборезов В.М., Виноградов В.Н., Евстратов А.И., Кирнос И.О., Суслова C.B. Приготовление объемистых кормов с использованием консервантов различной природы: Рекомендации. – Дубровицы: ВИЖ. – 2005. – 20 с.

Зубрилин А.А., Мишустин Е.Н. Силосование кормов. – М.: АН СССР. – 1958. – 255 с.

Ибраимова Ж.К., Рустенов А.Р., Елеугалиева Н.Ж., Олексиевич Е.А. Исследование эффективности силосования различного растительного сырья с применением некоторых видов молочнокислых бактерий в качестве консервантов // Биотехнология: теория и практика. – 2013. – № 3. – С. 41–45.

Практикум по зоотехническому анализу кормов: Учебное пособие (общ. ред. И. Ф. Драганова, В. М. Косолапова). – М.: Изд-во РГАУ–МСХА. – 2012. – 320 с.

Сультимова Т.Д., Стоянова Л.Г., Цыренов В.Ж. Биологический консервант на основе штамма Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis F-116 // Вестник Восточно-Сибирского государственного университета технологий и управления. – 2013. – Т. 44. – С. 91–98.

Jones R., Woolford M.K. Effect of biological additive on silage quality, efficient production and animal performance // Proceedings of the 18th Annual Research Meeting of the Irish Grassland and Animal Production Assosiation, Apr 3, 1992, Dublin, Ireland. – 1992. – Р. 65–66.

Kung Jr., L.A. A review on silage additives and enzymes / Department of Animal and Food Sciences. University of Delaware Newark. – 2010. – DE 19717-1303.

Schmidt R.J., Hu W., Mills J.A., Kung L. Jr. The development of lactic acid bacteria and Lactobacillus buchneri and their effects on the fermentation of alfalfa silage // Journal of Dairy Science. – 2009. – V. 92, No 10. – P. 5005–5010.

REFERENCES

Duborezov, V.M., Vinogradov, V.N., Evstratov, A.I., Kirnos, I.O., Suslova, S.V. (2005). Progotovlenie ob’emistyh kormov s ispol’zovaniev konservantov razlichnoi prirody: Rekomendatsii. Dubrovitsy: VIZH (in Russian).

Ibraimova, Zh.K., Rustenov, A.R., Eleugalieva, N.Zh., Oleksievich, E.A. (2013). Issledovanie effektivnosti silosovaniya razlichnogo rastitel’nogo syr’ya s primeneniem nekotoryh vidov molochnokislyh bakterii v kachestve konservantov. Biotechnologiya: teoriya i praktika, 3, 41–45 (in Russian).

Jones, R., Woolford, M.K. (1992). Effect of biological additive on silage quality, efficient production and animal performance. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Research Meeting of the Irish Grassland and Animal Production Assosiation, Apr 3, 1992, Dublin, Ireland.

Kung, Jr., L.A. (2010). A review on silage additives and enzymes. Department of Animal and Food Sciences. University of Delaware Newark. DE 19717-1303.

Praktikum po zootehnicheskomu analizu kormov: uchebnoe posobie. (2012). I.F. Draganov & V.M. Kosolapov (Eds.). Moscow: RGAU (in Russian).

Schmidt, R.J., Hu, W., Mills, J.A., Kung, L.Jr. (2009). The development of lactic acid bacteria and Lactobacillus buchneri and their effects on the fermentation of alfalfa silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(10), 5005–5010.

Sultimova T.D., Stoyanova L.G., Tsyrenov V.Zh. (2013). Biologicheskii konservant na osnove shtamma Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis F-116. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tehnologii i upravleniya. 44, 91–98 (in Russian).

Viktorov, P.I. (1991). Metodika i organizatsiya zootekhnicheskih opytov. Moscow: Agropromizdat (in Russian).

Vulford, M. (2007). Silos, senazh: rukovodstvo po zagotovke. Kyiv: Oltek Ukraina (in Russian).

Zubrilin, A.A., Mishustin, E.N. (1958). Silosovanie kormov. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences (in Russian).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/201658

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Since April 2018 Journal changed the editorial policy and starts to be published exclusively in English, and changed its main site into www.ujecology.com

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2017 Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. ISSN 2520-2138